Vel v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission [2000] FCA 1940
The Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a judgment of a single judge refusing leave to appeal; consequently, extension of time cannot be granted to allow an incompetent appeal. Even if jurisdiction existed, there is insufficient doubt as to the correctness of Lehane J's decision to warrant an extension or leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Vel; First Respondent: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; Second Respondent: The Commonwealth
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal, and Whether Appeal Competent
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; no order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of the Federal Court, Applications for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Discretion to Award Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Vel
Applicant
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
First Respondent
The Commonwealth
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal, and Whether Appeal Competent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a refusal of leave to appeal by a single judge
- 2 Whether an extension of time should be granted to appeal from Lehane J's judgment
- 3 Whether there is doubt on the correctness of the prior decision justifying leave to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a judgment of a single judge refusing leave to appeal; consequently, extension of time cannot be granted to allow an incompetent appeal. Even if jurisdiction existed, there is insufficient doubt as to the correctness of Lehane J's decision to warrant an extension or leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; no order as to costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment