VUKOVIC v PERRYMAN [1997] NSWCA 332
The finding of contributory negligence was not supported by evidence of practicable alternatives; the plaintiff had no reasonable option but to act as he did, so contributory negligence should not reduce his damages. The trial judge's assessment of value of residual earning capacity at $250 per week was a manifest overestimate and should be adjusted to $150 per week based on the plaintiff's age, language, and work history.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Peter Vukovic; Defendant: Philip Perryman; Defendant: State Rail Authority of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Appeal / Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- cross appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Damages, Workplace Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Vukovic
Plaintiff
Philip Perryman
Defendant
State Rail Authority of New South Wales
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Cross Appeal / Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent for standing on the load of the dump truck
- 2 Appropriate assessment of residual earning capacity and damages
Ratio Decidendi
The finding of contributory negligence was not supported by evidence of practicable alternatives; the plaintiff had no reasonable option but to act as he did, so contributory negligence should not reduce his damages. The trial judge's assessment of value of residual earning capacity at $250 per week was a manifest overestimate and should be adjusted to $150 per week based on the plaintiff's age, language, and work history.
Court Disposition
cross appeal allowed
Orders
- finding of contributory negligence quashed
- judgment for the plaintiff for damages undiminished
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment