R v Charlton [2024] NSWDC 633

R v Charlton [2024] NSWDC 633

The defendant was convicted of 21 counts of sexual offences against seven children under 10, involving multiple incidents over 23 years. The court found mid-range to high objective seriousness for several counts, with significant aggravating factors including breach of trust (parental/familial/authority roles), offending in the home of the victims, and victims' particular vulnerability due to age. No remorse or prospects of rehabilitation were found. An aggregate sentence with a non-parole period was appropriate and necessary to reflect criminality and protect the public; no special circumstances were found.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Peter William Charlton
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Conviction
Outcome
Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment; non-parole period set; no special circumstances found.
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences Against Children, Sentencing, Aggravating Factors, Breach of Trust, Objective Seriousness
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Against Children Sentencing Aggravating Factors Breach of Trust Objective Seriousness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 31
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Peter William Charlton

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for multiple sexual offences against children under 10 over 23 years?
  2. 2 Assessment of objective seriousness and aggravating factors in child sexual offences
  3. 3 Determination of aggregate sentencing and non-parole period for multiple counts

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was convicted of 21 counts of sexual offences against seven children under 10, involving multiple incidents over 23 years. The court found mid-range to high objective seriousness for several counts, with significant aggravating factors including breach of trust (parental/familial/authority roles), offending in the home of the victims, and victims' particular vulnerability due to age. No remorse or prospects of rehabilitation were found. An aggregate sentence with a non-parole period was appropriate and necessary to reflect criminality and protect the public; no special circumstances were found.

Court Disposition

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment; non-parole period set; no special circumstances found.

Orders

  • Defendant convicted on Counts 1-17, 19, 20, 21, 23.
  • Sentenced to total imprisonment of 16 years: non-parole period of 12 years (commencing 20 Dec 2021), eligible for parole 19 Dec 2033; balance of term 4 years expiring 19 Dec 2037.