Zonnevylle v Information Commissioner [2021] NSWCATAD 366
The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's administrative review proceedings because the Information Commissioner's election not to appear and be heard in the applicant's s. 110 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 approval application was not a reviewable decision under s. 80 of that Act, was not a refusal to deal with an access application under s. 60, and did not otherwise provide a basis for the Tribunal's administrative review jurisdiction. The proceeding was therefore misconceived and lacking in substance under s. 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application by the Information Commissioner for Dismissal of Administrative Review Proceedings Under S. 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (nsw) / Procedural Ruling Determined on the Papers
- Outcome
- The Information Commissioner's dismissal application was granted; the applicant's proceedings were dismissed, and the dismissal application was determined on the papers without an oral hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal' 'reviewable Decision' 'ncat Administrative Review Jurisdiction' 'government Information (public Access) Act 2009 Restraint Order Approval Proceedings' "information Commissioner's Right to Appear and Be Heard"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by the Information Commissioner for Dismissal of Administrative Review Proceedings Under S. 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (nsw) / Procedural Ruling Determined on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's proceeding for administrative review was misconceived, frivolous or vexatious under s. 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)." "Whether the Information Commissioner's decision or election not to appear and be heard in the applicant's s. 110 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 approval proceedings was a reviewable decision under s. 80 of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009." "Whether the Tribunal had administrative review jurisdiction over the applicant's complaints against the Information Commissioner." 'Whether the dismissal application could be adequately determined on the papers.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's administrative review proceedings because the Information Commissioner's election not to appear and be heard in the applicant's s. 110 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 approval application was not a reviewable decision under s. 80 of that Act, was not a refusal to deal with an access application under s. 60, and did not otherwise provide a basis for the Tribunal's administrative review jurisdiction. The proceeding was therefore misconceived and lacking in substance under s. 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
Court Disposition
The Information Commissioner's dismissal application was granted; the applicant's proceedings were dismissed, and the dismissal application was determined on the papers without an oral hearing.
Orders
- ['An oral hearing of the application by the Information Commissioner of 1 November 2021 is dispensed with and the application be determined on the papers.' 'The application by the Information Commissioner for the dismissal under s. 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 of matter 2021/247292 made...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment