Pfeizer Pty Ltd v Birkett [1999] FCA 1778
The affidavits of Dr McMahon were rejected because they sought to disprove matters of opinion rather than fact as required under the 'no evidence' ground of the ADJR Act, and because new evidence not before the decision maker (and not unreasonably omitted) is not admissible in support of an unreasonableness ground.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application on Evidentiary Admissibility
- Outcome
- Applicant's evidentiary motion dismissed; Affidavits rejected
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'judicial Review' 'unreasonableness' 'no Evidence Ground' 'opinions Versus Facts in Administrative Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Interlocutory Application on Evidentiary Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the affidavits of Dr Christopher Gordon McMahon are admissible in support of the grounds in the judicial review application on the basis that they seek to disprove matters of fact on which the administrative decision was based' 'Whether the affidavits can be relied upon in support of the unreasonableness ground where the material was not before the decision maker']
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavits of Dr McMahon were rejected because they sought to disprove matters of opinion rather than fact as required under the 'no evidence' ground of the ADJR Act, and because new evidence not before the decision maker (and not unreasonably omitted) is not admissible in support of an unreasonableness ground.
Court Disposition
Applicant's evidentiary motion dismissed; Affidavits rejected
Orders
- ['The two affidavits of Christopher Gordon McMahon, sworn respectively on 9 November 1999 and 6 December 1999, are rejected.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment