Walker v Roads and Maritime Services [2019] NSWCATAD 177
The applicant did not provide credible material that additional relevant documents exist. The respondent undertook reasonable searches using efficient means (Objective system, personal knowledge, third-party searches). Any further search would cause unreasonable diversion of resources. The decision that no further...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Affirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['freedom of Information' 'government Information (public Access)' 'administrative Review' 'adequacy of Search']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Scope of the access application under the GIPA Act' 'Whether there are reasonable grounds to believe requested documents exist and are held by the respondent' 'Whether the search efforts made by the respondent were reasonable']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not provide credible material that additional relevant documents exist. The respondent undertook reasonable searches using efficient means (Objective system, personal knowledge, third-party searches). Any further search would cause unreasonable diversion of resources. The decision that no further documents are held is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Affirmed
Orders
- ['The decision of the respondent made on 8 February 2019 that it holds no further documents relating to the design of the truck arrester bed in the Mona Vale Road East Upgrade Project is affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment