R v Hickson [2001] NSWCCA 113
Because the sentencing judge failed to take into account the applicant's assistance to law enforcement authorities, the sentencing discretion miscarried. The Court therefore granted leave, allowed the appeal, quashed the original sentence and resentenced the applicant after considering the assistance, the guilty plea and the applicant's subjective circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal; Resentencing After Sentence Appeal Allowed
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; resentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['armed Robbery With an Offensive Weapon' 'assistance to Law Enforcement Authorities' 'plea of Guilty' 'severity of Sentence' 'resentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal; Resentencing After Sentence Appeal Allowed
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to consider the applicant's assistance to law enforcement authorities." 'What sentence should be imposed on resentencing after taking into account the plea of guilty, assistance to authorities and subjective circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the sentencing judge failed to take into account the applicant's assistance to law enforcement authorities, the sentencing discretion miscarried. The Court therefore granted leave, allowed the appeal, quashed the original sentence and resentenced the applicant after considering the assistance, the guilty plea and the applicant's subjective circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; resentenced
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Sentence imposed in the court below quashed.' 'In lieu thereof, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months to date from 2 December 1999.' 'A non-parole period of one year and four months is specified to commence on 2 December...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment