Pollack, Phillip John v Retravision (NSW) Ltd [1997] FCA 552
Paragraphs A 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 of the subpoena are set aside as they are oppressive, seek documents not shown to be relevant to the issues in proceedings, or are unduly burdensome. Remaining paragraphs are stood over pending amended pleadings for further consideration.
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip John Pollack; Respondent: Retravision (N.S.W.) Limited; Subpoenaed Party: Mr A.S. Brown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion to Set Aside Subpoena / Interlocutory Decision
- Outcome
- Partial grant of application to set aside subpoena; remaining issues stood over.
- Legal Topics
- Subpoenas, Legal Professional Privilege, Oppression of Subpoena, Relevance of Evidence, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip John Pollack
Applicant
Retravision (N.S.W.) Limited
Respondent
Mr A.S. Brown
Subpoenaed Party
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion to Set Aside Subpoena / Interlocutory Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subpoena is oppressive
- 2 Whether documents sought are relevant to proceedings
- 3 Whether subpoena attempts to circumvent prior court ruling
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraphs A 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 of the subpoena are set aside as they are oppressive, seek documents not shown to be relevant to the issues in proceedings, or are unduly burdensome. Remaining paragraphs are stood over pending amended pleadings for further consideration.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of application to set aside subpoena; remaining issues stood over.
Orders
- Paragraphs A 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17 of the subpoena to Mr A.S. Brown issued 11 March 1997 are set aside.
- Balance of notice of motion filed 10 April 1997 is stood over until 27 June 1997.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment