Pollack, Philip John v Retravision (NSW) Ltd (ACN 000 384 565) [1996] FCA 1124
Leave to amend the statement of claim to plead a cause of action arising after commencement of proceedings was refused because the Federal Court Rules do not authorise such an amendment, and the subpoena was set aside as legal professional privilege was properly claimed in respect of the documents sought.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Judgment on Application to Amend Statement of Claim and to Set Aside Subpoena
- Outcome
- application to amend dismissed; subpoena set aside; costs in the cause
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Statement of Claim' 'subpoena' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'waiver']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Judgment on Application to Amend Statement of Claim and to Set Aside Subpoena
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the statement of claim can be amended to plead a cause of action arising after proceedings commenced' 'Whether the subpoena should be set aside due to legal professional privilege']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the statement of claim to plead a cause of action arising after commencement of proceedings was refused because the Federal Court Rules do not authorise such an amendment, and the subpoena was set aside as legal professional privilege was properly claimed in respect of the documents sought.
Court Disposition
application to amend dismissed; subpoena set aside; costs in the cause
Orders
- ['The application to further amend the statement of claim is dismissed.' 'The subpoena to Andrew Stuart Brown of 18 June 1996 is set aside.' 'The costs of the notice of motion are costs in the cause.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment