Pollack, Philip John v Retravision (NSW) Ltd [1997] FCA 1266
The respondent's failure to identify and discover documents critical to its case prior to the trial, as well as reliance on affidavits containing irrelevant material, justifies a departure from the usual costs rule. The applicant is ordered to pay only 75 per cent of the respondent's costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip John Pollack; Respondent: Retravision (NSW) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Applicant ordered to pay 75 per cent of respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Order, Discovery, Affidavit Relevance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip John Pollack
Applicant
Retravision (NSW) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there should be a departure from the general rule that an unsuccessful applicant should pay the respondent's costs due to incomplete discovery and irrelevant affidavits.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's failure to identify and discover documents critical to its case prior to the trial, as well as reliance on affidavits containing irrelevant material, justifies a departure from the usual costs rule. The applicant is ordered to pay only 75 per cent of the respondent's costs.
Court Disposition
Applicant ordered to pay 75 per cent of respondent's costs.
Orders
- The applicant pay 75 per cent of the respondent's costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment