Proietti v Proietti (No 5) [2023] NSWCA 284
The applicant's notice of motion is dismissed as vexatious and an abuse of process because it repeats grounds already finally determined by the Court and raises no new issue.
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip Proietti; First Respondent: Peter Proietti; Second Respondent: Ian Colwell Miller & Peter Joseph Dominello as Court Appointed Trustees
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Motion to Set Aside Orders; Teoh Order Process
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as an abuse of process
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Teoh Order, Motion to Set Aside Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Proietti
Applicant
Peter Proietti
First Respondent
Ian Colwell Miller & Peter Joseph Dominello as Court Appointed Trustees
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Motion to Set Aside Orders; Teoh Order Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's notice of motion should be dismissed as vexatious or an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the applicant should be further subject to orders under the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's notice of motion is dismissed as vexatious and an abuse of process because it repeats grounds already finally determined by the Court and raises no new issue.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as an abuse of process
Orders
- The applicant's notice of motion filed 13 November 2023 is dismissed.
- Mr Proietti may file by email to the associate of Payne JA, by 4pm on 4 December 2023, submissions of no more than three pages as to whether the Court should, of its own motion, fix a hearing to consider whether Mr Proietti's claims generally, or about any of the matters the subject of a determination by the Supreme...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment