Doyle v State Parole Authority of NSW and Anor [2019] NSWSC 774
The pre-release report included misleading information about charges being listed for hearing; the Authority's reliance on this information impacted its parole refusal decision in a manner amounting to manifest injustice under statutory provisions. The Court directed the Authority accordingly and dismissed proceedings otherwise.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Philip William Doyle; First Defendant: NSW State Parole Authority; Second Defendant: Attorney General for New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Prerogative Relief Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made as agreed; proceedings otherwise dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Directions Under S 155 Crimes (administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (nsw), Manifest Injustice, Misleading Information in Parole Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip William Doyle
Plaintiff
NSW State Parole Authority
First Defendant
Attorney General for New South Wales
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prerogative Relief Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pre-release report contained false or misleading information affecting parole decision
- 2 Whether the Authority's decision to refuse parole based on misleading information amounted to manifest injustice
Ratio Decidendi
The pre-release report included misleading information about charges being listed for hearing; the Authority's reliance on this information impacted its parole refusal decision in a manner amounting to manifest injustice under statutory provisions. The Court directed the Authority accordingly and dismissed proceedings otherwise.
Court Disposition
Orders made as agreed; proceedings otherwise dismissed
Orders
- Order directing the State Parole Authority pursuant to s 155 of the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW) that the pre-release report of Community Corrections dated 15 October 2018 contained misleading information regarding plaintiff's charges listed for hearing on 3 December 2018; the Authority's...
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment