Phillip Davis and Portseal Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 9
The application to vacate the hearing date was refused as the respondent had knowledge of its principals’ travel many months in advance and did not take reasonable steps to avoid a clash with the assigned hearing date; the court’s policy favours expeditious handling of matters potentially affecting employment and earning capacity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Compensation for Unlawful Termination / Interlocutory; Application to Vacate Hearing Date
- Outcome
- Respondent's application to vacate hearing date dismissed; applicant awarded costs of the day.
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Termination' 'vacation of Hearing Date' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Compensation for Unlawful Termination / Interlocutory; Application to Vacate Hearing Date
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing date should be vacated due to overseas absence of respondent’s principal witnesses' 'Whether the respondent acted unreasonably in seeking to vacate the hearing date at short notice' 'Entitlement to costs arising from interlocutory application']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to vacate the hearing date was refused as the respondent had knowledge of its principals’ travel many months in advance and did not take reasonable steps to avoid a clash with the assigned hearing date; the court’s policy favours expeditious handling of matters potentially affecting employment and earning capacity.
Court Disposition
Respondent's application to vacate hearing date dismissed; applicant awarded costs of the day.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion of the Respondent dismissed.' 'Applicant’s costs of the day to be met by the Respondent in accordance with the Federal Court scale.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment