Regina v Davis [2001] NSWCCA 254
Leave to appeal is granted based on undue harshness caused by having to serve the entire sentence in maximum security for an instinctive escape; minimum term for offence of 24 April 1998 reduced to two years six months; no error found in parity analysis or drug valuation impact on sentencing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Sentencing Reassessment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal against sentence for offence of 24 April 1998 allowed; minimum term reduced. Appeal against sentence for offence of 23 November 1998 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'appeal' 'maximum Security Imprisonment' 'parity Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Sentencing Reassessment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given maximum security imprisonment for escape police custody.' 'Whether parity principles and Judicial Commission statistics warranted intervention.' 'Accuracy of drug valuation and impact on sentencing.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is granted based on undue harshness caused by having to serve the entire sentence in maximum security for an instinctive escape; minimum term for offence of 24 April 1998 reduced to two years six months; no error found in parity analysis or drug valuation impact on sentencing.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal against sentence for offence of 24 April 1998 allowed; minimum term reduced. Appeal against sentence for offence of 23 November 1998 dismissed.
Orders
- ['Applicant sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years starting on 19 January 2000 with a non-parole period of 2 years 6 months ending on 18 July 2002 for offence of 24 April 1998.' 'Sentence for offence of 23 November 1998 (LSD) taking into account matters on Form 1 dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment