Bell, P.H. v. The Queen [1985] FCA 614
The evidence of the appellant's prior sale of heroin was admissible as it was part of the res gestae and probative of his purpose in possessing heroin on the charged date; the appeals against conviction fail and confessional evidence was rightly admitted.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Phillip Harold Bell; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction (full Federal Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to amend notice of appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Similar Fact Evidence, Confession, Cross Examination, Unsafe Verdict
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phillip Harold Bell
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction (full Federal Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the admission of evidence of the accused's prior sale of heroin was inadmissible as similar fact evidence or improperly prejudicial
- 2 Whether the evidence was admissible as part of the res gestae
- 3 Whether cross-examination of the police officer as to being a witness of truth was wrongly disallowed
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the appellant's prior sale of heroin was admissible as it was part of the res gestae and probative of his purpose in possessing heroin on the charged date; the appeals against conviction fail and confessional evidence was rightly admitted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to amend notice of appeal refused.
Orders
- Leave to amend the notice of appeal be refused.
- The appeals be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment