Johnston v TAFE NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 152

Johnston v TAFE NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 152

The Tribunal found that TAFE NSW took reasonable steps to locate documents, had reasonably characterised withheld documents as subject to legal professional privilege, and had correctly imposed processing charges based on a correct distinction between personal and non-personal information. Therefore, the original decision was affirmed.

Parties
Applicant: Phillip Johnston; Respondent: TAFE NSW
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 August 2019
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Outcome
The decision under review is affirmed.
Legal Topics
Access to Information, Legal Professional Privilege, Processing Charges, Personal Information

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phillip Johnston

Applicant

TAFE NSW

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Review / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether further information within the scope of the access application is held by the respondent
  2. 2 Whether information withheld is subject to legal professional privilege
  3. 3 Whether processing charge was correctly imposed based on characterisation of personal and non-personal information

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that TAFE NSW took reasonable steps to locate documents, had reasonably characterised withheld documents as subject to legal professional privilege, and had correctly imposed processing charges based on a correct distinction between personal and non-personal information. Therefore, the original decision was affirmed.

Court Disposition

The decision under review is affirmed.

Orders

  • The decision under review is affirmed.