Phillip Murray SMILES v Thomas William MOON [2003] NSWSC 519

Phillip Murray SMILES v Thomas William MOON [2003] NSWSC 519

The defendant did not breach any duty owed to the plaintiff in contract or tort; even if omissions occurred, they did not cause any damage, as no reasonable advice, assistance, or intervention could have prevented or delayed prosecution or damages to Mr Smiles. The plaintiff concealed material facts, and Mr Moon was entitled to rely on information received. The pursuit and outcome of the audit and prosecution would have been unaffected by any action taken by the defendant.

Parties
Plaintiff: Phillip Murray Smiles; Defendant: Thomas William Moon
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Taxation, Accountants' Duty of Care, Breach of Retainer, Damages, Apportionment of Employment Expenses
Professional Negligence Taxation Accountants' Duty of Care Breach of Retainer Damages Apportionment of Employment Expenses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phillip Murray Smiles

Plaintiff

Thomas William Moon

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached his retainer and was guilty of professional negligence in relation to acts and omissions in the course of acting for Mr Smiles in his taxation affairs
  2. 2 Whether omissions by Mr Moon resulted in damage to Mr Smiles
  3. 3 Whether advice or intervention by Mr Moon could have prevented or delayed prosecution and damages to Mr Smiles

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant did not breach any duty owed to the plaintiff in contract or tort; even if omissions occurred, they did not cause any damage, as no reasonable advice, assistance, or intervention could have prevented or delayed prosecution or damages to Mr Smiles. The plaintiff concealed material facts, and Mr Moon was entitled to rely on information received. The pursuit and outcome of the audit and prosecution would have been unaffected by any action taken by the defendant.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed

Orders

  • The proceedings be dismissed.
  • The Plaintiff pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis including reserved costs.