See v R [2017] NSWCCA 165
The sentencing judge correctly applied the totality principle and gave proper regard to the delay and interstate sentence; adequately considered mental illness, remorse, and rehabilitation prospects; and the sentence imposed was within the sentencing discretion and not manifestly excessive. Each ground of appeal was not established and the appeal must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal and Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'totality Principle' 'mental Illness in Sentencing' 'remorse in Sentencing' 'rehabilitation Prospects' 'manifest Excess' 'firearms Offences' 'break and Enter Offences' 'dealing With Proceeds of Crime']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentencing judge gave sufficient regard to Victorian offences and delay under totality principles' "Whether sentencing judge adequately took into account applicant's mental abnormality" "Whether sentencing judge adequately considered applicant's remorse and prospects of rehabilitation" 'Whether the sentence is manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge correctly applied the totality principle and gave proper regard to the delay and interstate sentence; adequately considered mental illness, remorse, and rehabilitation prospects; and the sentence imposed was within the sentencing discretion and not manifestly excessive. Each ground of appeal was not established and the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment