Regina v Massart [2000] NSWCCA 150

Regina v Massart [2000] NSWCCA 150

The respondent's mental illness and supportive circumstances rendered her case exceptional; the sentences imposed were not manifestly inadequate given these factors and the requirements of parity with her co-offender.

Parties
Crown/appellant: Regina; Respondent: Phyllis Massart
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Crown appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Supply, Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor, Exceptional Case, Parity in Sentencing
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Supply Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor Exceptional Case Parity in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 17
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown/appellant

Phyllis Massart

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Crown Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed for drug supply were manifestly inadequate
  2. 2 Whether the mental illness of the respondent was appropriately considered as a mitigating factor
  3. 3 Assessment of relative criminality between respondent and co-offender Metreski

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's mental illness and supportive circumstances rendered her case exceptional; the sentences imposed were not manifestly inadequate given these factors and the requirements of parity with her co-offender.

Court Disposition

Crown appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Crown appeal is dismissed