Khoury v Coffey Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 591
The plaintiff's cause of action accrued no later than 30 November 2008, when the money was not repaid, so proceedings commenced after 30 November 2014 are statute barred and must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Interlocutory Motions; Determination of Amendment and Strike Out Applications
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for leave to amend denied; statement of claim struck out as against the first defendant; proceedings dismissed as against the first defendant with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['statute of Limitations' 'misleading Representations' 'date of Cause of Action Accrual' 'trade Practices Act Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Interlocutory Motions; Determination of Amendment and Strike Out Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 ['When did the cause of action accrue for purposes of limitation?' 'Is the claim statute barred under the Limitations Act 1969 (NSW) and Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)?' 'Should leave to amend the statement of claim be granted?']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's cause of action accrued no later than 30 November 2008, when the money was not repaid, so proceedings commenced after 30 November 2014 are statute barred and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for leave to amend denied; statement of claim struck out as against the first defendant; proceedings dismissed as against the first defendant with costs.
Orders
- ['Statement of claim struck out as against the first defendant.' 'Judgment for the first defendant in the proceedings.' "Plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment