Tigani v Hazelbrook [2023] NSWLEC 1061
The Court does not have jurisdiction to make orders as the alleged severe obstruction concerns sunlight to a courtyard, not to a window, and in relation to the new window, the obstruction by the trees is not severe and did not develop during applicant's ownership.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Pt 2 a / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['trees – Disputes Between Neighbours' 'obstruction of Sunlight' 'jurisdictional Limitation Under Trees Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Pt 2 a / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trees severely obstruct sunlight to a window of applicant's dwelling" 'Whether the Court has jurisdiction regarding sunlight obstruction to a courtyard' "Whether loss of sunlight to a window must develop during applicant's ownership"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court does not have jurisdiction to make orders as the alleged severe obstruction concerns sunlight to a courtyard, not to a window, and in relation to the new window, the obstruction by the trees is not severe and did not develop during applicant's ownership.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ['The application is refused.' 'The exhibits are returned, other than A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment