Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Limited [2017] FCA 627
It was not practicable to serve the Originating Documents on the respondent under the Hague Convention as the registered address was deserted and the respondent had no forwarding address; the documents were brought to the attention of the respondent by email; therefore the requirements for deemed service under r 10.48 were satisfied.
- Parties
- Applicant: Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd; Respondent: Triangl Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Orders Made on Interlocutory Application Regarding Service
- Outcome
- Orders made granting deemed service, extending time for defence, allowing email service, costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Service Outside Australia, Deemed Service, Federal Court Rules 2011 (cth) R 10.48, Hague Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd
Applicant
Triangl Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Orders Made on Interlocutory Application Regarding Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service in accordance with the Hague Convention was reasonably practicable
- 2 Whether documents were brought to the attention of the respondent via email
- 3 Whether it is appropriate to deem service under r 10.48 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
It was not practicable to serve the Originating Documents on the respondent under the Hague Convention as the registered address was deserted and the respondent had no forwarding address; the documents were brought to the attention of the respondent by email; therefore the requirements for deemed service under r 10.48 were satisfied.
Court Disposition
Orders made granting deemed service, extending time for defence, allowing email service, costs reserved.
Orders
- Documents dated 12 July 2016 (Fast Track Application, Fast Track Statement, Genuine Steps Statement) deemed served on the respondent on 23 February 2017 under r 10.48.
- Time for the respondent to file a notice of address for service and defence extended to 7 July 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment