PITSIAVAS V. JOHN LYSAGHT (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED

PITSIAVAS V. JOHN LYSAGHT (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED

There was no evidence fit for the consideration of the jury on the issue of the alleged negligence of the respondent; appeal dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: PITSTAVAS; Respondent: JOHN LYSAGHT (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 1963
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PITSTAVAS

Appellant

JOHN LYSAGHT (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Ratio Decidendi

There was no evidence fit for the consideration of the jury on the issue of the alleged negligence of the respondent; appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • appeal dismissed with costs