Pittwater Council v Walters & Anor [2003] NSWLEC 97
The respondents were not released from the undertakings because no material change in circumstance was shown: although the Trevor Howse & Associates report had been prepared and relevant work apparently undertaken, the Council had not approved the work as the undertaking contemplated, and the fire safety issues concerned a building accessed by the public.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judgment on Notice of Motion for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Respondents' Notice of Motion dismissed; Council ordered to provide a written response to the Trevor Howse & Associates report by 5 pm on 8 October 2002.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Relief' 'release From Undertakings' 'fire Safety' 'building Code of Australia Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judgment on Notice of Motion for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the first and second respondents should be released from undertakings given on 9 September 2002.' 'Whether there had been a material change in circumstance sufficient to justify release from the undertakings.']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents were not released from the undertakings because no material change in circumstance was shown: although the Trevor Howse & Associates report had been prepared and relevant work apparently undertaken, the Council had not approved the work as the undertaking contemplated, and the fire safety issues concerned a building accessed by the public.
Court Disposition
Respondents' Notice of Motion dismissed; Council ordered to provide a written response to the Trevor Howse & Associates report by 5 pm on 8 October 2002.
Orders
- ["The Respondent's Notice of Motion is dismissed." "The Applicant is to provide a written response in relation to the Trevor Howse & Associates' report to the Respondent by 5 pm on 8 October 2002."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment