Plaintiff S111A/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 3) [2021] FCA 207

Plaintiff S111A/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs (No 3) [2021] FCA 207

Leave to file and rely upon the second further amended statement of claim is granted because the interests of justice, efficient conduct of proceedings, and the applicant’s continued detention outweigh any asserted procedural prejudice to the respondents. Both parties have had sufficient time and access to materials to prepare their cases, and further interlocutory debate is disproportionate to the case’s scope.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Migration Proceeding / Leave to Amend Statement of Claim; Pre Trial
Outcome
Leave granted to applicant to file second further amended statement of claim, subject to redactions; timetable for filing pleadings fixed; costs of interlocutory application reserved; restriction on further interlocutory applications without leave.
Legal Topics
['amendment of Pleadings' 'asio Security Assessments' 'procedural Fairness' 'detention and False Imprisonment' 'non Refoulement Obligations']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'human Rights Law' 'constitutional Law'] ['amendment of Pleadings' 'asio Security Assessments' 'procedural Fairness' 'detention and False Imprisonment' 'non Refoulement Obligations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in Migration Proceeding / Leave to Amend Statement of Claim; Pre Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the applicant to file a second further amended statement of claim in light of a new ASIO security assessment and related claims' "Whether the respondents have sufficient clarity and particulars to plead to and meet the applicant's amended case" 'Potential prejudice to the respondents by permitting further amendments']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to file and rely upon the second further amended statement of claim is granted because the interests of justice, efficient conduct of proceedings, and the applicant’s continued detention outweigh any asserted procedural prejudice to the respondents. Both parties have had sufficient time and access to materials to prepare their cases, and further interlocutory debate is disproportionate to the case’s scope.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to applicant to file second further amended statement of claim, subject to redactions; timetable for filing pleadings fixed; costs of interlocutory application reserved; restriction on further interlocutory applications without leave.

Orders

  • ['The applicant be granted leave to rely at trial upon the second further amended statement of claim in the form annexed to the affidavit of Ms Zali Burrows affirmed 23 February 2021, but with all necessary redactions to remove any identifying information about the applicant.' 'On or before 12 noon on Friday 12...