Minogue v VictoriaCitation:[2019] HCA 31Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:11 Sep 2019Case Number:M162/2018Read more

Minogue v VictoriaCitation:[2019] HCA 31Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:11 Sep 2019Case Number:M162/2018Read more

Sections 74AB and 74AAA of the Corrections Act 1986 (Vic) do not contravene Ch III of the Constitution, do not amount to legislative resentencing, and do not impose additional or separate punishment beyond that imposed by the sentencing court.

Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: State of Victoria
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Power, Legislative Punishment, Parole, Life Imprisonment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

State of Victoria

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether ss 74AB and 74AAA of the Corrections Act 1986 (Vic) are contrary to Ch III of the Constitution and therefore invalid
  2. 2 Whether ss 74AB and 74AAA impermissibly legislatively resentenced the plaintiff
  3. 3 Whether ss 74AB and 74AAA impose additional or separate punishment to that imposed by the sentencing court

Ratio Decidendi

Sections 74AB and 74AAA of the Corrections Act 1986 (Vic) do not contravene Ch III of the Constitution, do not amount to legislative resentencing, and do not impose additional or separate punishment beyond that imposed by the sentencing court.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed

Orders

  • Sections 74AB and 74AAA of the Corrections Act 1986 (Vic) are valid and not contrary to Ch III of the Constitution
  • Plaintiff's application is dismissed