New South Wales v RobinsonCitation:[2019] HCA 46Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:04 Dec 2019Case Number:S119/2019Read more
The arrest was unlawful because the police officer did not have the intention to charge or bring the plaintiff before an authorised officer to be dealt with according to law at the time of arrest, as required by s 99 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW).
- Parties
- Applicant: Plaintiff; Respondent: State Police
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Police Powers, Arrest Without Warrant, False Imprisonment, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Applicant
State Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arrest without warrant was unlawful under s 99 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the absence of intention to charge or bring before an authorised officer at the time of arrest rendered the arrest unlawful
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment
Ratio Decidendi
The arrest was unlawful because the police officer did not have the intention to charge or bring the plaintiff before an authorised officer to be dealt with according to law at the time of arrest, as required by s 99 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW).
Court Disposition
claim upheld
Orders
- The arrest was declared unlawful.
- The plaintiff is entitled to damages for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment