PO v R [2020] NSWCCA 129
The sentence imposed was within the range available to the sentencing judge and no error has been identified; the applicant's subjective circumstances were appropriately considered, and the imposition of fulltime custody was warranted given the objective seriousness. The appeal ground was not made out.
- Parties
- Applicant: PO; Respondent Crown: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision on Leave and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, Intimidation of Witnesses, Manifestly Excessive Sentence, Objective Seriousness, Subjective Case, Discount for Guilty Plea, Special Circumstances, Fulltime Custody, Imprisonment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PO
Applicant
Regina
Respondent Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision on Leave and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether error occurred in the assessment of the objective seriousness of the offending
- 3 Whether the applicant's subjective case was adequately considered
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was within the range available to the sentencing judge and no error has been identified; the applicant's subjective circumstances were appropriately considered, and the imposition of fulltime custody was warranted given the objective seriousness. The appeal ground was not made out.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal be granted.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment