Raymond v Northern Territory of Australia [2004] FCAFC 258
Section 50(2C) of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act operates to bar the Commissioner from performing functions on an application made to claim alienated Crown land held by or on behalf of Aboriginals, in the absence of written consent from those interest holders, and this jurisdictional bar is not...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Aboriginal Land Commissioner' 'consent Requirements for Land Claims' 'effect of Statutory Amendments on Land Claims']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 50(2C) of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth) prevents the Commissioner from exercising functions when Aboriginal interest holders have not consented to the application' "Whether a later disposition of Aboriginal interests reactivates the Commissioner's jurisdiction" 'Whether s 67A bars the disposal of Aboriginal interests during a pending claim']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 50(2C) of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act operates to bar the Commissioner from performing functions on an application made to claim alienated Crown land held by or on behalf of Aboriginals, in the absence of written consent from those interest holders, and this jurisdictional bar is not lifted by subsequent disposition of those interests to non-Aboriginal holders.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment