Application by Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd [2019] ACompT 1
The scope of the access determination is confined to where Glencore owns or, directly or by agent, charters a vessel to enter and load Glencore coal in the Port precinct. No deduction for user contributions is justified in the regulated asset base as there is no satisfactory evidence either of an agreement or of a shared expectation leading to such anticipated adjustments in pricing. The Tribunal restored the RAB to full ORC value and set the Navigation Service Charge accordingly. The DORC methodology agreed between the parties, with prudent input assumptions and an integrated 12-year construction period, appropriately reflects efficient replacement cost. There is no requirement for a...
- Parties
- Applicant: Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd; Applicant/respondent/user: Glencore Coal Assets Australia Pty Ltd; Respondent/arbitrator: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Applications for Review (re Arbitration) Under S 44 ZP of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (cth) of an Arbitration Determination by the ACCC in an Access Dispute / Final Determination by the Tribunal on Review (re Arbitration)
- Outcome
- The Tribunal varied the ACCC's Final Determination.
- Legal Topics
- Access Pricing, Declared Services, Regulated Asset Base (rab), Depreciated Optimised Replacement Cost (dorc), User Contributions, Port Charges, Navigation Service Charge, Wharfage Charge, Scope of Arbitration, Regulatory Methodology, Pricing Principles, Capex True Up, Interest During Construction, Non Coal Assets Allocation, Construction Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd
Applicant
Glencore Coal Assets Australia Pty Ltd
Applicant/respondent/user
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Respondent/arbitrator
Procedural Posture
Applications for Review (re Arbitration) Under S 44 ZP of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (cth) of an Arbitration Determination by the ACCC in an Access Dispute / Final Determination by the Tribunal on Review (re Arbitration)
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate scope of the access determination applying to Glencore for use of the Port of Newcastle?
- 2 Should user contributions be deducted from the regulated asset base in setting the Navigation Service Charge?
- 3 What methodology and assumptions should be applied in valuing the replacement cost of port assets (DORC)?
Ratio Decidendi
The scope of the access determination is confined to where Glencore owns or, directly or by agent, charters a vessel to enter and load Glencore coal in the Port precinct. No deduction for user contributions is justified in the regulated asset base as there is no satisfactory evidence either of an agreement or of a shared expectation leading to such anticipated adjustments in pricing. The Tribunal restored the RAB to full ORC value and set the Navigation Service Charge accordingly. The DORC methodology agreed between the parties, with prudent input assumptions and an integrated 12-year construction period, appropriately reflects efficient replacement cost. There is no requirement for a...
Court Disposition
The Tribunal varied the ACCC's Final Determination.
Orders
- Scope of the determination confined to Glencore owning or directly/through agent chartering a vessel entering and loading Glencore coal; not applicable to other vessels/charges than Navigation Service Charge and Wharfage Charge; Navigation Service Charge as at 1 January 2018 set at $1.0058 per gross tonne.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment