Port Stephens Council v Chan Industrial Pty Limited & Anor [2005] NSWCA 232

Port Stephens Council v Chan Industrial Pty Limited & Anor [2005] NSWCA 232

The 'finished ground level of the completed building' in the LEP definition of 'height' refers to the finished surface of the ground where it generally abuts the completed building, not to the lowest level within the building's footprint such as a basement slab; therefore, the primary judge erred in determining the measurement for height control exceeded the limit.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Land and Environment Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['development Consent' 'building Height Control' 'statutory Construction' 'local Environmental Plan']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Land and Environment Court

  1. 1 ["Proper construction of the definition of 'height' in the Port Stephens Local Environmental Plan 2000" 'Whether development consent for a building exceeding the LEP height limit was lawful']

Ratio Decidendi

The 'finished ground level of the completed building' in the LEP definition of 'height' refers to the finished surface of the ground where it generally abuts the completed building, not to the lowest level within the building's footprint such as a basement slab; therefore, the primary judge erred in determining the measurement for height control exceeded the limit.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Appeal allowed' 'Declaration and orders of Cowdroy J on 19 November 2004 set aside' 'Proceedings remitted to the Land and Environment Court for further consideration and determination in accordance with this decision' "First respondent to pay appellant's and second respondent's costs in the lower court on the...