FHH v Port Stephens Council [2023] NSWCATAP 239
The Appeal Panel held that the information complained of in slide 10 was contained in a publicly available publication, namely the previous Tribunal decision, and therefore did not fall within the definition of personal information under s 4 of the PPIP Act. Because ss 15 and 16 apply to personal information, they had no application to that information. The Tribunal therefore did not err by not dealing with the Appellants' contentions that the Respondent breached ss 15 or 16, and the appeal grounds were rejected.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal in Privacy Proceedings Under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (nsw) / Appeal Panel Decision on Appeal From the Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division, [2023] NSWCATAD 101
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['disclosure of Personal Information' 'publicly Available Information' 'privacy Principles 15 and 16' 'failure to Address Submissions' 'costs Submissions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal in Privacy Proceedings Under the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (nsw) / Appeal Panel Decision on Appeal From the Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division, [2023] NSWCATAD 101
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to articulate or deal with the real issues in dispute raised by the Appellants.' "Whether the Tribunal failed to address the Appellants' submissions concerning privacy principles 15 and 16 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)." 'Whether the information in slide 10 was personal information under s 4 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW), given that it was in a publicly available publication.' "Whether sections 15 or 16 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) applied to the information used in the Respondent's presentation."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel held that the information complained of in slide 10 was contained in a publicly available publication, namely the previous Tribunal decision, and therefore did not fall within the definition of personal information under s 4 of the PPIP Act. Because ss 15 and 16 apply to personal information, they had no application to that information. The Tribunal therefore did not err by not dealing with the Appellants' contentions that the Respondent breached ss 15 or 16, and the appeal grounds were rejected.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal is dismissed.' 'If the Respondent wishes to apply for costs it is to file submissions and evidence in support within 14 days of the date of this decision and such submissions are to include whether or not a lump sum order should be made for costs, and, if so, in what amount.' 'The Appellants are to file any...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment