Port Stephens Council v Webb [2017] NSWCATAD 341
Although the statutory requirement for making a restraint order was satisfied (more than three meritless applications in two years), the Tribunal determined, in its discretion, that the number and nature of Ms Webb's applications did not warrant the significant restriction of her statutory rights, particularly given the measure of successful and specific applications.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Application for Restraint Order / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['government Information (public Access) Act' 'restraint Orders' 'unmeritorious Access Applications' 'exercise of Discretion' 'access to Government Information']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Application for Restraint Order / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether respondent made at least three access applications in previous two years that lack merit under s 110 of the GIPA Act' 'Whether discretionary factors favour the making of a restraint order restraining access applications by Ms Webb']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the statutory requirement for making a restraint order was satisfied (more than three meritless applications in two years), the Tribunal determined, in its discretion, that the number and nature of Ms Webb's applications did not warrant the significant restriction of her statutory rights, particularly given the measure of successful and specific applications.
Court Disposition
Application is dismissed.
Orders
- ['Application for restraint order dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment