Port Waratah Coal Services Enterprise Agreement 2002 [2002] NSWIRComm 249
The Commission was satisfied that the material presented adequately demonstrated that the agreement complied with all necessary tests, and all parties to the agreement consented to it; therefore the agreement was approved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Approval of an Enterprise Agreement / Decision
- Outcome
- The Port Waratah Coal Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2002 was approved.
- Legal Topics
- ['enterprise Agreement Approval' 'no Net Detriment Test' 'duress' 'statutory Requirements for Approval']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Approval of an Enterprise Agreement / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Port Waratah Coal Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2002 should be approved.' "Whether the agreement complied with the relevant statutory requirements, satisfied the no net detriment test, was not entered into under duress, and complied with the Commission's principles for approval."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission was satisfied that the material presented adequately demonstrated that the agreement complied with all necessary tests, and all parties to the agreement consented to it; therefore the agreement was approved.
Court Disposition
The Port Waratah Coal Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2002 was approved.
Orders
- ['The Port Waratah Coal Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2002 is approved in the terms of the application, with effect from 22 August 2002, with retrospective effect as to wages and allowances from the first pay period on or after 1 August 2002; to remain in force for a period of two years therefrom.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment