PORT WARATAH STEVEDORING CO PTY LTD v GRECH; PORT WARATAH STEVEDORING CO PTY LTD v JOANNOU [1995] NSWCA 375
The appellate court could not safely draw the inferences required to determine the limitation extension application according to the proper legal principles post-Dedousis, because the trial judge's findings were based on different legal questions; therefore, the fairest course was to set aside the District Court's...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Port Waratah Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd; Respondent: Grech; Respondent: Joannou
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal, Determination of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeals upheld, orders set aside, applications remitted to District Court
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Extension of Limitation Period
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Port Waratah Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd
Appellant
Grech
Respondent
Joannou
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal, Determination of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellate court could safely draw inferences from the available evidence necessary to determine applications to extend time under the Limitation Act, in light of the High Court's decision in Dedousis.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court could not safely draw the inferences required to determine the limitation extension application according to the proper legal principles post-Dedousis, because the trial judge's findings were based on different legal questions; therefore, the fairest course was to set aside the District Court's orders and remit the applications to be determined afresh.
Court Disposition
appeals upheld, orders set aside, applications remitted to District Court
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeals upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment