PORT WARATAH STEVEDORING CO PTY LTD v GRECH; PORT WARATAH STEVEDORING CO PTY LTD v JOANNOU [1995] NSWCA 375

PORT WARATAH STEVEDORING CO PTY LTD v GRECH; PORT WARATAH STEVEDORING CO PTY LTD v JOANNOU [1995] NSWCA 375

The appellate court could not safely draw the inferences required to determine the limitation extension application according to the proper legal principles post-Dedousis, because the trial judge's findings were based on different legal questions; therefore, the fairest course was to set aside the District Court's...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Port Waratah Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd; Respondent: Grech; Respondent: Joannou
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 October 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal, Determination of Appeal
Outcome
appeals upheld, orders set aside, applications remitted to District Court
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Extension of Limitation Period
Civil Procedure Limitation of Actions Appeals Extension of Limitation Period

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Port Waratah Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd

Appellant

Grech

Respondent

Joannou

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal, Determination of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellate court could safely draw inferences from the available evidence necessary to determine applications to extend time under the Limitation Act, in light of the High Court's decision in Dedousis.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court could not safely draw the inferences required to determine the limitation extension application according to the proper legal principles post-Dedousis, because the trial judge's findings were based on different legal questions; therefore, the fairest course was to set aside the District Court's orders and remit the applications to be determined afresh.

Court Disposition

appeals upheld, orders set aside, applications remitted to District Court

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeals upheld.