See, Robert Francis v. Milner, Robin Victor Edwin [1980] FCA 182

See, Robert Francis v. Milner, Robin Victor Edwin [1980] FCA 182

Evidence obtained under the search was properly admitted despite potential defects in the warrant, as police acted in good faith and judicial discretion favored the public interest in prosecution. The appellant was found to have sufficient custody and knowledge to constitute possession of heroin under the relevant legislation. Methaqualone was properly declared a narcotic drug for purposes of the Poisons Ordinance via Gazette notice. The identification of Mandrax tablets containing methaqualone was sufficiently supported by expert testimony. The sentences imposed were not excessive and were appropriately determined based on the appellant's circumstances and prior offending.

Parties
Appellant (defendant): Robert Francis See; Respondent (informant): Robin Victor Edwin Milner
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 December 1980
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment From the Federal Court of Australia on Appeal From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Outcome
Each appeal is dismissed.
Legal Topics
Possession of Prohibited Drugs, Validity of Search Warrant, Admissibility of Evidence, Mental Element of Possession, Declaration of Narcotic Drugs, Sentencing
Criminal Law Practice and Procedure Possession of Prohibited Drugs Validity of Search Warrant Admissibility of Evidence Mental Element of Possession Declaration of Narcotic Drugs Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Francis See

Appellant (defendant)

Robin Victor Edwin Milner

Respondent (informant)

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment From the Federal Court of Australia on Appeal From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Validity of search warrant issued by Clerk of Petty Sessions under Public Health (Prohibited Drugs) Ordinance
  2. 2 Meaning of 'possession' under s.4(1) Public Health (Prohibited Drugs) Ordinance and mens rea requirements
  3. 3 Whether methaqualone was declared a 'narcotic drug' for purposes of s.35 Poisons and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance

Ratio Decidendi

Evidence obtained under the search was properly admitted despite potential defects in the warrant, as police acted in good faith and judicial discretion favored the public interest in prosecution. The appellant was found to have sufficient custody and knowledge to constitute possession of heroin under the relevant legislation. Methaqualone was properly declared a narcotic drug for purposes of the Poisons Ordinance via Gazette notice. The identification of Mandrax tablets containing methaqualone was sufficiently supported by expert testimony. The sentences imposed were not excessive and were appropriately determined based on the appellant's circumstances and prior offending.

Court Disposition

Each appeal is dismissed.

Orders

  • Convictions, sentences and orders of the trial judge are confirmed.
  • Sentences to be served concurrently and to date from 4 December 1980.