Re Basile, T. v. Ex parte Ancich, E.J. [1985] FCA 474
No writ of execution may be issued in respect of the order for costs made by Spender J in these bankruptcy proceedings, as the rules supplement and supersede statutory power and do not provide for execution in bankruptcy cases.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application for Writ of Execution; Referred Question After Judgment on Petition
- Outcome
- No writ of execution may be issued in respect of the costs order.
- Legal Topics
- ['power to Issue Writs of Execution' 'relationship of Court Rules to Statutory Powers' 'enforcement of Costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application for Writ of Execution; Referred Question After Judgment on Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Registrar in Bankruptcy may issue a writ of execution in respect of a Federal Court costs order made in bankruptcy proceedings' 'If so, what form should such writ take']
Ratio Decidendi
No writ of execution may be issued in respect of the order for costs made by Spender J in these bankruptcy proceedings, as the rules supplement and supersede statutory power and do not provide for execution in bankruptcy cases.
Court Disposition
No writ of execution may be issued in respect of the costs order.
Orders
- ['No writ of execution is to issue in respect of the order for costs made by Spender J.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment