Pozetu Pty Ltd v Alexander James Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 239
The original judgment erroneously referred to NCAT when the proceedings were in fact before the ADT; these errors constitute accidental slips or omissions and may be corrected without affecting the reasoning or the outcome, pursuant to the slip rule.
- Parties
- Applicant: Pozetu Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Alexander James Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Christopher Dedman; Third Respondent: Christopher Hancock; Fourth Respondent: Anthony Maxworthy
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders (other Than Costs) / Court of Appeal – Amendment of Principal Judgment Under Slip Rule
- Outcome
- The principal judgment is amended under the slip rule to correct references to the relevant Tribunal and make associated changes.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Judgment, Slip Rule, Tribunal Structure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pozetu Pty Ltd
Applicant
Alexander James Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Christopher Dedman
Second Respondent
Christopher Hancock
Third Respondent
Anthony Maxworthy
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders (other Than Costs) / Court of Appeal – Amendment of Principal Judgment Under Slip Rule
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principal judgment misidentified the relevant Tribunal as NCAT rather than ADT
- 2 Whether orders should be varied under the slip rule to correct accidental errors in the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The original judgment erroneously referred to NCAT when the proceedings were in fact before the ADT; these errors constitute accidental slips or omissions and may be corrected without affecting the reasoning or the outcome, pursuant to the slip rule.
Court Disposition
The principal judgment is amended under the slip rule to correct references to the relevant Tribunal and make associated changes.
Orders
- The judgment of the Court delivered on 12 August 2016 be amended pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.17 as stated in this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment