PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48

PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48

The primary judge did not err in treating delay as of lesser relevance absent proven prejudice; the applicant did not demonstrate any actual prejudice; the discretionary order for security for costs was lawfully made and there were no grounds to set it aside.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Decision Ordering Security for Costs
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'judicial Discretion' 'delay and Prejudice' 'appellate Review of Procedural Orders']
['civil Procedure'] ['security for Costs' 'judicial Discretion' 'delay and Prejudice' 'appellate Review of Procedural Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Decision Ordering Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in the exercise of discretion in ordering security for costs' 'Whether delay in bringing a security for costs application should affect the decision to order security' 'Whether incurring legal costs generates a presumption of prejudice']

Ratio Decidendi

The primary judge did not err in treating delay as of lesser relevance absent proven prejudice; the applicant did not demonstrate any actual prejudice; the discretionary order for security for costs was lawfully made and there were no grounds to set it aside.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused.' "Applicant to pay respondents' costs."]