Patel v North Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1222
The Court, being satisfied that the decision agreed by the parties at the conciliation conference was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, disposed of the proceedings accordingly under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, granting development consent subject to specified conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Pratibha Patel; Respondent: North Sydney Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Demolition and Construction, Conciliation Conference, Section 34 Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pratibha Patel
Applicant
North Sydney Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consent should be granted to a development application for demolition and construction of a dwelling at 6 Ross Street, Waverton
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied that the decision agreed by the parties at the conciliation conference was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, disposed of the proceedings accordingly under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, granting development consent subject to specified conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- The Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely on amended plan DA-02 Issue D Floor Plans drawn by Ae design partnership dated 2.6.16.
- The Appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment