Patel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1220
The appeal was dismissed because, even assuming the appellant could seek to change the nominated skilled occupation to Computing Professional, cl 485.214 required that an application for assessment of skills for that nominated skilled occupation be made at the time of the visa application, and the appellant had not applied for such an assessment at that time. Sections 54, 55, 104 and 105 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) did not permit the appellant in the circumstances to cure that failure by changing the nominated skilled occupation after the application was made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['subclass 485 Skilled Graduate Visa' 'nominated Skilled Occupation' 'skills Assessment' 'jurisdictional Error' 'construction of Migration Regulations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the requirement in Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2 cl 485.214 required the appellant to have applied for a skills assessment for the nominated skilled occupation at the time of the visa application.' 'Whether the appellant could change his nominated skilled occupation from Family Counsellor to Computing Professional during the visa application process.' 'Whether ss 54, 55, 104 and 105 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) permitted correction or change of the nominated skilled occupation in the circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because, even assuming the appellant could seek to change the nominated skilled occupation to Computing Professional, cl 485.214 required that an application for assessment of skills for that nominated skilled occupation be made at the time of the visa application, and the appellant had not applied for such an assessment at that time. Sections 54, 55, 104 and 105 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) did not permit the appellant in the circumstances to cure that failure by changing the nominated skilled occupation after the application was made.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment