Precious Metals Australia Limited v Xstrata Windimurra Pty Limited & Anor; Precious Metals Australia Limited v Xstrata (Schweiz) AG [2005] NSWSC 220
Upon interpretation of clause 7.7(a) of the Royalty Agreement, Xstrata is not liable to pay or reimburse PMA’s costs for the action against Xwin as they are incurred or prior to resolution of action 50113/04, nor regardless of success. The Court made an order on the separate question accordingly. Directions were given for both related proceedings to be heard together, and costs were awarded to Xstrata (Schweiz) AG as the successful party on the separate question.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Commercial Proceedings / Determination of Costs and Directions on Separate Question
- Outcome
- Orders made on separate question and costs; security for costs ordered; related proceedings to be heard together.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'indemnity' 'security for Costs' 'related Proceedings' 'construction of Contract Clauses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Commercial Proceedings / Determination of Costs and Directions on Separate Question
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Xstrata is liable under clause 7.7(a) of the Royalty Agreement to pay or reimburse PMA for costs incurred in prosecuting action 50113/04 as and when incurred or regardless of outcome' "Whether declaration should be made regarding Xstrata's indemnity for PMA's costs if PMA is successful" 'Appropriate orders as to costs and security for costs in related proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Upon interpretation of clause 7.7(a) of the Royalty Agreement, Xstrata is not liable to pay or reimburse PMA’s costs for the action against Xwin as they are incurred or prior to resolution of action 50113/04, nor regardless of success. The Court made an order on the separate question accordingly. Directions were given for both related proceedings to be heard together, and costs were awarded to Xstrata (Schweiz) AG as the successful party on the separate question.
Court Disposition
Orders made on separate question and costs; security for costs ordered; related proceedings to be heard together.
Orders
- ['Court answered separate question: Xstrata not liable for costs as and when incurred or regardless of success as per Royalty Agreement clause 7.7(a).' 'Order that PMA pay the costs of Xstrata (Schweiz) AG of the summary judgment motion and of the separate question determination on a party party basis.' "Order that...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment