Preferred Projects (Buildings) Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [1999] NSWLEC 283
Commissioner Watts should be disqualified because opinions and judgments expressed in earlier proceedings on key issues, combined with foreshadowed judgments on prospective changes, give rise to a reasonable apprehension that he cannot bring an unbiased and unprejudiced mind to the determination of the modified development application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Planning Appeal / Motion for Disqualification of Commissioner
- Outcome
- Commissioner Watts disqualified from hearing the proceedings; question of costs reserved; matter to be expedited and listed for hearing at earliest opportunity.
- Legal Topics
- ['bias' 'apprehended Pre Judgment' 'disqualification of Commissioner' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Planning Appeal / Motion for Disqualification of Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Commissioner Watts should be disqualified for apprehended pre-judgment in determining the modified development application']
Ratio Decidendi
Commissioner Watts should be disqualified because opinions and judgments expressed in earlier proceedings on key issues, combined with foreshadowed judgments on prospective changes, give rise to a reasonable apprehension that he cannot bring an unbiased and unprejudiced mind to the determination of the modified development application.
Court Disposition
Commissioner Watts disqualified from hearing the proceedings; question of costs reserved; matter to be expedited and listed for hearing at earliest opportunity.
Orders
- ['Commissioner Watts is disqualified from hearing the proceedings.' 'Matter be granted expedition.' 'Parties to approach Registrar for an alternative hearing date as soon as possible.' 'Question of costs reserved.' 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment