Chand, Prem v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs & Ors [1996] FCA 1184
The Tribunal asked the correct question of whether the marital relationship was genuine and continuing, considered relevant evidence, and was not affirmatively satisfied that there was a genuine ongoing relationship. No error of law was shown in the Tribunal's approach or conclusion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['entry Permit' 'spouse Visa' 'marital Relationship Genuineness' 'tribunal Decision Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the marital relationship between the applicant and principal is genuine and continuing' 'Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself as to the nature of a genuine marital relationship' 'Whether any presumption as to genuineness exists']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal asked the correct question of whether the marital relationship was genuine and continuing, considered relevant evidence, and was not affirmatively satisfied that there was a genuine ongoing relationship. No error of law was shown in the Tribunal's approach or conclusion.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment