Inspector Stephen Charles v Premier Precast Pty Limited [2009] NSWIRComm 136
The defendant was objectively liable for failing to ensure employee safety by not providing adequate guarding, risk assessment, instruction or supervision, even if it did not subjectively foresee the precise risk; the risk was reasonably foreseeable, rendering the offence objectively serious under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Inspector Stephen Charles; Defendant: Premier Precast Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution Under Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted and fined.
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Injury, Duty of Care, Risk Assessment, Foreseeability, Mitigation, Company Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inspector Stephen Charles
Prosecutor
Premier Precast Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant failed to ensure safety of employees as required by s 8(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000
- 2 Whether the risk was reasonably foreseeable
- 3 Relevance of absence of subjective foresight
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was objectively liable for failing to ensure employee safety by not providing adequate guarding, risk assessment, instruction or supervision, even if it did not subjectively foresee the precise risk; the risk was reasonably foreseeable, rendering the offence objectively serious under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted and fined.
Orders
- Defendant Premier Precast Pty Limited is convicted of the offence.
- Defendant is fined $99,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment