R v Thomas; Ex parte Brodsky [1963] HCA 25

R v Thomas; Ex parte Brodsky [1963] HCA 25

The subject of the inquiry—the provision of medical services by Dr. Brodsky, and claims made concerning those services under the Pensioner Medical Service Agreement—constitutes a 'matter' within the meaning of the relevant statutory provisions. Therefore, the reference to the Committee was valid, and no prohibition lies.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application for Writ of Prohibition / Judgment on Return of Order Nisi
Outcome
Order nisi discharged with costs.
Legal Topics
['prerogative Writs' "meaning of 'matter' Under Statute" 'medical Services Inquiry' 'prohibition']
['administrative Law' 'constitutional Law' 'health Law'] ['prerogative Writs' "meaning of 'matter' Under Statute" 'medical Services Inquiry' 'prohibition']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Writ of Prohibition / Judgment on Return of Order Nisi

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the subject of the proposed inquiry is a 'matter' within the meaning of ss. 111 and 125 of the National Health Act 1953-1962 (Cth)" "Whether the Committee's proceedings are amenable to prohibition"]

Ratio Decidendi

The subject of the inquiry—the provision of medical services by Dr. Brodsky, and claims made concerning those services under the Pensioner Medical Service Agreement—constitutes a 'matter' within the meaning of the relevant statutory provisions. Therefore, the reference to the Committee was valid, and no prohibition lies.

Court Disposition

Order nisi discharged with costs.

Orders

  • ['Order nisi for prohibition discharged.' 'Prosecutor to pay costs.']