Preston Erection Pty Ltd & Anor v Speedy Gantry Hire Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1615

Preston Erection Pty Ltd & Anor v Speedy Gantry Hire Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1615

The combination of modular gantry units, though novel, was obvious to a skilled person in the field, combining known elements and addressing longstanding needs, with prior art showing the concept was considered. Accordingly, the patent did not involve an inventive step and was revoked.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 December 1998
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['patent Obviousness' 'patent Entitlement' 'patent Revocation' 'false Representation']
['intellectual Property' 'patents'] ['patent Obviousness' 'patent Entitlement' 'patent Revocation' 'false Representation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the patent was obvious' 'Whether Speedy Gantry was entitled to the patent' 'Whether the patent was obtained by false suggestion or misrepresentation' 'Patent infringement']

Ratio Decidendi

The combination of modular gantry units, though novel, was obvious to a skilled person in the field, combining known elements and addressing longstanding needs, with prior art showing the concept was considered. Accordingly, the patent did not involve an inventive step and was revoked.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be allowed.' 'The orders made on 13 May 1998 be set aside and in lieu thereof it be ordered that the application be dismissed.' 'Letters Patent 578,176 be revoked.' 'The respondent pay the costs of the appellants of the appeal and of the proceedings at first instance.' 'The cross-appeal be dismissed...