PrimeQ Limited, in the matter of PrimeQ Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 2073
The schemes were approved because PrimeQ complied with the convening orders, the statutory voting majorities were well exceeded, ASIC had no objection, there was no evidence of improper purpose, oppression, inadequate disclosure or public policy objection, and the schemes were fair and reasonable. The s 411(12) exemption was granted because, given the terms of the schemes and that PrimeQ would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Accenture, compliance with s 411(11) was not necessary.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 411(4)(b) and S 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Approval of Two Schemes of Arrangement and Exemption From S 411(11) Compliance / Second Court Hearing for Approval of Schemes of Arrangement
- Outcome
- Application granted; schemes approved and exemption from s 411(11) compliance ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['schemes of Arrangement' 'share Acquisition' 'court Approval Under S 411(4)(b)' 'exemption Under S 411(12)' 'asic No Objection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 411(4)(b) and S 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Approval of Two Schemes of Arrangement and Exemption From S 411(11) Compliance / Second Court Hearing for Approval of Schemes of Arrangement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the scheme of arrangement between PrimeQ Limited and holders of its ordinary shares should be approved under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the scheme of arrangement between PrimeQ Limited and holders of its Class A performance shares should be approved under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether PrimeQ Limited should be exempted under s 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) from compliance with s 411(11) in relation to the schemes.']
Ratio Decidendi
The schemes were approved because PrimeQ complied with the convening orders, the statutory voting majorities were well exceeded, ASIC had no objection, there was no evidence of improper purpose, oppression, inadequate disclosure or public policy objection, and the schemes were fair and reasonable. The s 411(12) exemption was granted because, given the terms of the schemes and that PrimeQ would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Accenture, compliance with s 411(11) was not necessary.
Court Disposition
Application granted; schemes approved and exemption from s 411(11) compliance ordered.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to subs 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the scheme of arrangement between PrimeQ Limited and the holders of its ordinary shares in the form annexed and marked "A" be approved.' 'Pursuant to subs 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the scheme of arrangement between PrimeQ Limited...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment