Prince Building Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council [2022] NSWLEC 1707
Because the parties reached an agreement that the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, and the Court was satisfied that the amended development application had owner consent, notification had been addressed, the development was permissible with consent in the B6 Enterprise Corridor zone, the cl 4.6 written request adequately justified the minor height exceedance, and relevant provisions of the Cumberland Local Environmental Plan 2021 and applicable State Environmental Planning Policies had been considered and addressed by reports and conditions, the Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application Da2020/0385 / Orders Made Following Agreement Reached at Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application DA2020/0385 as amended, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['mixed Use Development' 'development Application Appeal' 'conciliation Agreement' 'variation of Height of Buildings Development Standard' 'clause 4.6 Written Request' 'hotel and Office Development' 'environmental Planning Instruments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application Da2020/0385 / Orders Made Following Agreement Reached at Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether Development Application DA2020/0385, as amended, satisfied the jurisdictional prerequisites for the grant of development consent under s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' "Whether the Applicant's written request under cl 4.6 of the Cumberland Local Environmental Plan 2021 adequately justified variation of the height of buildings development standard in cl 4.3 of the Cumberland Local Environmental Plan 2021."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement that the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, and the Court was satisfied that the amended development application had owner consent, notification had been addressed, the development was permissible with consent in the B6 Enterprise Corridor zone, the cl 4.6 written request adequately justified the minor height exceedance, and relevant provisions of the Cumberland Local Environmental Plan 2021 and applicable State Environmental Planning Policies had been considered and addressed by reports and conditions, the Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application DA2020/0385 as amended, subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend Development Application DA2020/0385 and rely upon amended plans and documents referred to in condition 2 at Annexure A.' "The Applicant's written request, pursuant to cl 4.6 of the Cumberland Local Environmental Plan 2021 (CLEP), seeking to vary the development standard...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment