Attorney-General (NSW) v Hill and Halls Limited [1923] HCA 22
Priority between competing liens under the Liens on Crops and Wool and Stock Mortgages Act 1898 (N.S.W.) is determined by the date of execution of the agreement provided both are registered within thirty days, not by the date of registration. Section 12 of the Registration of Deeds Act 1897 (N.S.W.) does not apply to liens registered under the Liens Act.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Attorney-General for New South Wales; Defendant/respondent: Hill & Halls Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales, Judgment of Full Court
- Outcome
- appeal allowed, Supreme Court decision reversed
- Legal Topics
- Priority of Liens, Registration of Liens, Liens on Crops and Wool and Stock Mortgages Act, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney-General for New South Wales
Plaintiff/appellant
Hill & Halls Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales, Judgment of Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether priority between competing liens on the same crop is determined by date of execution or date of registration under the Liens on Crops and Wool and Stock Mortgages Act 1898 (N.S.W.)
- 2 Whether liens on crops registered under sec. 4 of the Liens Act are affected by sec. 12 of the Registration of Deeds Act 1897 (N.S.W.)
Ratio Decidendi
Priority between competing liens under the Liens on Crops and Wool and Stock Mortgages Act 1898 (N.S.W.) is determined by the date of execution of the agreement provided both are registered within thirty days, not by the date of registration. Section 12 of the Registration of Deeds Act 1897 (N.S.W.) does not apply to liens registered under the Liens Act.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed, Supreme Court decision reversed
Orders
- Judgment entered for the appellant for £156 18s. 7d., with interest at the rate of sixpence per day from 31st January 1922 to the date of judgment, with costs, including costs of the special case.
- Appellant to pay respondent's costs of appeal as between solicitor and client.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment